Rationalization of diagnosis and prediction of traumatic brain injury outcomes by blood biomarkers
https://doi.org/10.21869/2223-1536-2025-15-4-235-248
Abstract
The purpose of the research is rationalization of diagnosis and prediction of traumatic brain injury outcomes by blood biomarkers.
Methods. In 125 examined mature (45–59 years old) and elderly (60–74 years old) patients with mild and moderate TBI, blood counts were studied on the 12th day after receiving it. A general blood test was performed using an automatic analyzer on a GS480A device (China), and a biochemical blood test was performed on a THERMO FISHER SCIENTIFIC Konelab Prime 30 device (Pharmа, Russia). Using a one-factor regression analysis of the studied 13 blood parameters, diagnostic and prognostic significance for 11 variables was revealed. To assess the quality of the predictive multivariate regression model, ROC analysis (Receiver Operator Characteristic) was used, and the area under the curve (AUC) was used to assess the discrimination of the model.
Results. In the multifactorial regression analysis in the uncorrected model, all 11 variables with the highest beta coefficient for blood levels of potassium, leukocytes, glucose, lymphocytes, and glucose-to-potassium ratio retained diagnostic and prognostic significance. At the same time, the gender- and age–adjusted multifactorial regression model included only 7 variables, and taking into account the most significant ones, a predictive model was developed: y = 7,561 + 2,652x1 – 2,848x2 + 2,458x3 + 2,573x4. The prognostic value of the created model showed that the AUC is 0,725 (p = 0,0012) with a sensitivity of 62,875% and a specificity of 71,896%.
Conclusion. The created model is of sufficient quality and can be used to diagnose and predict adverse outcomes of traumatic brain injury.
About the Authors
A. S. LysenkoРоссия
Anastasia S. Lysenko, Neurologist
40 Sadovaya Str., Kursk 305004
N. M. Agarkov
Россия
Nikolay M. Agarkov, Professor at the Department of Propaedeutics of Internal Diseases and Clinical Information Technologies; Doctor of Sciences (Medical), Professor, Professor at the Department of Biomedical Engineering
85 Pobedy str., Belgorod 308015;
50 Let Oktyabrya Str. 94, Kursk 305040
T. I. Yakunchenko
Россия
Tatyana I. Yakunchenko, Doctor of Sciences (Medical), Professor, Head of the Department of Propaedeutics of Internal Diseases and Clinical Information Technologies; Leading Researcher at the Department of Biomedical Engineering
85 Pobedy str., Belgorod 308015;
50 Let Oktyabrya Str. 94, Kursk 305040
S N. Gontarev
Россия
Sergey N. Gontarev, Doctor of Sciences (Medical), Professor, Head of the Department of Pediatric Dentistry; Leading Researcher at the Department of Biomedical Engineering
85 Pobedy str., Belgorod 308015;
50 Let Oktyabrya Str. 94, Kursk 305040
D. R. Shmarova
Россия
Diana R. Shmarova, Student at the Department of Biomedical Engineering
50 Let Oktyabrya Str. 94, Kursk 305040
A. A. Shorokhova
Россия
Anastasia A. Shorokhova, Student at the Department of Biomedical Engineering
50 Let Oktyabrya Str. 94, Kursk 305040
References
1. Capizzi A., Woo J., Verduzco-Gutierrez M. Traumatic brain injury. Med. Clin. North. Am. 2020;(104):213–238. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mcna.2019.11.001
2. Sulhan S., Lyon K.A., Shapiro L.A., Huang J.H. Neuroinflammation and blood-brain barrier disruption following traumatic brain injury: Pathophysiology and potential therapeutic targets. J. Neurosci. Res. 2020;98:19–28. https://doi.org/10.1002/jnr.24331
3. Kempuraj D., Selvakumar G.P., Ahmed M.E., et al. COVID-19, Mast Cells, Cytokine Storm, Psychological Stress, and Neuroinflammation. Neuroscientist. 2020;(26):402–414. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073858420941476
4. Mozaffari K., Dejam D., Duong C., et al. Systematic Review of Serum Biomarkers in Traumatic Brain Injury. Cureus. 2021;(13):e17056. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.17056
5. Wang K.K., Yang Z., Zhu T., et al. An update on diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers for traumatic brain injury. Expert Rev Mol Diagn. 2018;(18):165–180. https://doi.org/10.1080/14737159.2018.1428089
6. Tsitsipanis C., Miliaraki M., Paflioti E., et al. Inflammation biomarkers IL 6 and IL 10 may improve the diagnostic and prognostic accuracy of currently authorized traumatic brain injury tools. Exp Ther Med. 2023;(26):364. https://doi.org/10.3892/etm.2023.12063
7. Potapov A.A., Krylov V.V., Petrikov S.S., et al. Clinical recommendations "Focal brain injury". Moscow: Assotsiatsiya neirokhirurgov Rossii, 2024. 82 р. (In Russ.)
8. Zhao J.L., Lai S.T., Du Z.Y., et al. Circulating neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio at admission predicts the long-term outcome in acute traumatic cervical spinal cord injury patients. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2020;(21):548. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-020-03556-z
9. Wang F., Wang L., Jiang T.T., et al. Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte ratio is an independent predictor of 30-day mortality of intracerebral hemorrhage patients: A validation cohort study. Neurotox Res. 2018;34(3):347–352. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12640-018-9890-6
10. Chen J., Qu X., Li Z., et al. Peak neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte ratio correlates with clinical outcomes in patients with severe traumatic brain injury. Neurocrit Care. 2019;30(2):334–339. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12028-018-0622-9
11. Lattanzi S., Cagnetti C., Provinciali L., et al. Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte ratio predicts the outcome of acute intracerebral hemorrhage. Stroke. 2016;47(6):1654–1657. https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.116.013627
12. Siwicka-Gieroba D., Malodobry K., Biernawska J., et al. The Neutrophil/Lymphocyte Count Ratio Predicts Mortality in Severe Traumatic Brain Injury Patients. J. Clin. Med. 2019;(8):1453. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm8091453
13. Chen W., Yang J., Li B., et al. Neutrophil to Lymphocyte Ratio as a Novel Predictor of Outcome in Patients With Severe Traumatic Brain Injury. J. Head Trauma Rehabil. 2018;(33):E53–E59. https://doi.org/10.1097/HTR.0000000000000320
14. Dolmans R.G.F., Hulsbergen A.F.C., Gormley W.B., Broekman M.L.D. Routine Blood Tests for Severe Traumatic Brain Injury: Can They Predict Outcomes? World Neurosurg. 2020;136:e60–e67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2019.10.086
15. Alam A., Thelin E.P., Tajsic T., et al. Cellular infiltration in traumatic brain injury. J. Neuroinflammation. 2020;(17):328. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12974-020-02005-x
16. Chen L., Xia S., Zuo Y., et al. Systemic immune inflammation index and peripheral blood carbon dioxide concentration at admission predict poor prognosis in patients with severe traumatic brain injury. Front Immunol. 2023;(12):1034916. https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2022.1034916
17. Wang R., He M., Zhang J., et al. A Prognostic Model Incorporating Red Cell Distribution Width to Platelet Ratio for Patients with Traumatic Brain Injury. Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2021;(17):1239–1248. https://doi.org/10.2147/TCRM.S337040
18. Patet C., Suys T., Carteron L., et al. Cerebral Lactate Metabolism After Traumatic Brain Injury. Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep. 2016;16(4):31. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11910-016-0638-5
19. Wang R., He M., Qu F., et al. Lactate Albumin Ratio is Associated With Mortality in Patients With Moderate to Severe Traumatic Brain Injury. Front Neurol. 2022;(13):662385. https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2022.662385
20. Rei K.M., Siddiqi J. Novel Hematologic Inflammatory Biomarker Ratios Derived From Routinely Ordered Labs Upon Admission: Enhancement of the International Mission for Prognosis and Analysis of Clinical Trials Prognostic Model for Moderate-to-Severe Traumatic Brain Injury. Cureus. 2025;(17):e92601. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.92601
Review
For citations:
Lysenko A.S., Agarkov N.M., Yakunchenko T.I., Gontarev S.N., Shmarova D.R., Shorokhova A.A. Rationalization of diagnosis and prediction of traumatic brain injury outcomes by blood biomarkers. Proceedings of the Southwest State University. Series: IT Management, Computer Science, Computer Engineering. Medical Equipment Engineering. 2025;15(4):235-248. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21869/2223-1536-2025-15-4-235-248
JATS XML


